Add an edge to a graph to minimize the average shortest path length

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












This program is used to find the nodes in a grid network, between which, if an edge is added, the average shortest path length of the entire grid reduces by the most.



"Average shortest path length" is the statistic computed by the NetworkX function average_shortest_path_length, that is, $$ sum_s,t∈V d(s, t) over n(n-1) $$ where $V$ is the set of nodes, $n = left|Vright|$ is the number of nodes, and $d(s, t)$ is the length of the shortest path from $s$ to $t$.



My original program was taking a long time to execute so I decided to make a multiprocessing program, but it is taking even more time than the original one.



So the function that is called by the processes needs to return three values: distance, node1, and node2; and so I used three queues for that. Now I need to get the values of node1 and node2 for which the distance is minimum(of the four processes. I used a while and a for loop just to get those two nodes.



I believe this must be the reason for the slow execution of my program. So is there a better way to get the nodes with minimum distance?



import networkx as nx
import itertools

no_of_nodes = 4

no_of_links = 4

#generates a grid of size specified
G = nx.grid_graph(dim=[no_of_nodes,no_of_nodes], periodic=False)

#for APL
distance=nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)

#to keep track of how many links have been added
nloops=1

def f(l1,l2, q, r, s):

distance=nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)
for x,y in itertools.product(range(no_of_nodes), range(no_of_nodes)):
for i,j in itertools.product(range(l1,l2), range(no_of_nodes)):
#if loop to prevent self loops and multilinks
if (i,j) not in G[(x,y)] and (i,j)!=(x,y):
G.add_edge((x, y), (i, j))
newdistance= nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)
G.remove_edge((x, y), (i, j))
if newdistance<distance:
distance= newdistance
node1a=x
node1b=y
node2a=i
node2b=j

q.put(distance)
r.put((node1a, node1b))
s.put((node2a, node2b))


while nloops<=llno:
if __name__ == '__main__':
q = Queue()
r = Queue()
s = Queue()

p1 = Process(target=f, args=(0, no_of_nodes/4, q, r, s))
p1.start()
p2 = Process(target=f, args=(no_of_nodes/4, no_of_nodes/2, q, r, s))
p2.start()
p3 = Process(target=f, args=(no_of_nodes/2, 3*no_of_nodes/4, q, r, s))
p3.start()
p4 = Process(target=f, args=(3*no_of_nodes/4, no_of_nodes, q, r, s))
p4.start()

min_d = 100
count = 0
dists=
nodesa=
nodesb=

while count<4:
dists.append(q.get())
nodesa.append(r.get())
nodesb.append(s.get())
count+=1
for x in range(4):
if dists[x]<min_d:
min_d=dists[x]
n1a=nodesa[x]
n2a=nodesb[x]
print (min_d, n1a, n2a)
G.add_edge(n1a, n2a)


In the sequential solution, it was possible to find the nodes with minimum distance from the function itself, unlike multiprocessing where it can't be found from the function because I need all possible cases from the four processes.



import networkx as nx
import itertools

no_of_nodes = 4

no_of_links = 4

#generates a grid of size specified
G = nx.grid_graph(dim=[no_of_nodes,no_of_nodes], periodic=False)

#for APL
distance=nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)

#to keep track of how many links have been added
nloops=1

while nloops<=llno:
for x,y in itertools.product(range(no_of_nodes), range(no_of_nodes)):
for i,j in itertools.product(range(x,no_of_nodes), range(no_of_nodes)):
#if loop to prevent self loops and multilinks
if (i,j) not in G[(x,y)] and (i,j)!=(x,y):
G.add_edge((x, y), (i, j))
newdistance= nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)
if newdistance<distance:
distance= newdistance
node1a=x
node1b=y
node2a=i
node2b=j
#removes the last added edge
G.remove_edge((x, y), (i, j))

print "minimum APL = ",distance, " node 1 =",(node1a, node1b), " node 2=" ,(node2a, node2b)
G.add_edge((node1a, node1b), (node2a, node2b))

nloops+=1






share|improve this question





















  • This code is at least missing the proper imports.
    – Mast
    Jun 8 at 18:35










  • this is not the full code, it's just a part of it. And the code is working fine, I just want it to execute faster
    – Akshay Nambiar
    Jun 8 at 18:45







  • 4




    If you want a proper review, showing the full code is definitely preferred if not required. Uploading only an example leaves us guessing at some of your intentions which may render the given advice useless.
    – Mast
    Jun 8 at 18:52






  • 1




    okay guys, I have added the entire code, hope this helps. If you can't understand the purpose of any part, please ask me
    – Akshay Nambiar
    Jun 9 at 1:44

















up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












This program is used to find the nodes in a grid network, between which, if an edge is added, the average shortest path length of the entire grid reduces by the most.



"Average shortest path length" is the statistic computed by the NetworkX function average_shortest_path_length, that is, $$ sum_s,t∈V d(s, t) over n(n-1) $$ where $V$ is the set of nodes, $n = left|Vright|$ is the number of nodes, and $d(s, t)$ is the length of the shortest path from $s$ to $t$.



My original program was taking a long time to execute so I decided to make a multiprocessing program, but it is taking even more time than the original one.



So the function that is called by the processes needs to return three values: distance, node1, and node2; and so I used three queues for that. Now I need to get the values of node1 and node2 for which the distance is minimum(of the four processes. I used a while and a for loop just to get those two nodes.



I believe this must be the reason for the slow execution of my program. So is there a better way to get the nodes with minimum distance?



import networkx as nx
import itertools

no_of_nodes = 4

no_of_links = 4

#generates a grid of size specified
G = nx.grid_graph(dim=[no_of_nodes,no_of_nodes], periodic=False)

#for APL
distance=nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)

#to keep track of how many links have been added
nloops=1

def f(l1,l2, q, r, s):

distance=nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)
for x,y in itertools.product(range(no_of_nodes), range(no_of_nodes)):
for i,j in itertools.product(range(l1,l2), range(no_of_nodes)):
#if loop to prevent self loops and multilinks
if (i,j) not in G[(x,y)] and (i,j)!=(x,y):
G.add_edge((x, y), (i, j))
newdistance= nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)
G.remove_edge((x, y), (i, j))
if newdistance<distance:
distance= newdistance
node1a=x
node1b=y
node2a=i
node2b=j

q.put(distance)
r.put((node1a, node1b))
s.put((node2a, node2b))


while nloops<=llno:
if __name__ == '__main__':
q = Queue()
r = Queue()
s = Queue()

p1 = Process(target=f, args=(0, no_of_nodes/4, q, r, s))
p1.start()
p2 = Process(target=f, args=(no_of_nodes/4, no_of_nodes/2, q, r, s))
p2.start()
p3 = Process(target=f, args=(no_of_nodes/2, 3*no_of_nodes/4, q, r, s))
p3.start()
p4 = Process(target=f, args=(3*no_of_nodes/4, no_of_nodes, q, r, s))
p4.start()

min_d = 100
count = 0
dists=
nodesa=
nodesb=

while count<4:
dists.append(q.get())
nodesa.append(r.get())
nodesb.append(s.get())
count+=1
for x in range(4):
if dists[x]<min_d:
min_d=dists[x]
n1a=nodesa[x]
n2a=nodesb[x]
print (min_d, n1a, n2a)
G.add_edge(n1a, n2a)


In the sequential solution, it was possible to find the nodes with minimum distance from the function itself, unlike multiprocessing where it can't be found from the function because I need all possible cases from the four processes.



import networkx as nx
import itertools

no_of_nodes = 4

no_of_links = 4

#generates a grid of size specified
G = nx.grid_graph(dim=[no_of_nodes,no_of_nodes], periodic=False)

#for APL
distance=nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)

#to keep track of how many links have been added
nloops=1

while nloops<=llno:
for x,y in itertools.product(range(no_of_nodes), range(no_of_nodes)):
for i,j in itertools.product(range(x,no_of_nodes), range(no_of_nodes)):
#if loop to prevent self loops and multilinks
if (i,j) not in G[(x,y)] and (i,j)!=(x,y):
G.add_edge((x, y), (i, j))
newdistance= nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)
if newdistance<distance:
distance= newdistance
node1a=x
node1b=y
node2a=i
node2b=j
#removes the last added edge
G.remove_edge((x, y), (i, j))

print "minimum APL = ",distance, " node 1 =",(node1a, node1b), " node 2=" ,(node2a, node2b)
G.add_edge((node1a, node1b), (node2a, node2b))

nloops+=1






share|improve this question





















  • This code is at least missing the proper imports.
    – Mast
    Jun 8 at 18:35










  • this is not the full code, it's just a part of it. And the code is working fine, I just want it to execute faster
    – Akshay Nambiar
    Jun 8 at 18:45







  • 4




    If you want a proper review, showing the full code is definitely preferred if not required. Uploading only an example leaves us guessing at some of your intentions which may render the given advice useless.
    – Mast
    Jun 8 at 18:52






  • 1




    okay guys, I have added the entire code, hope this helps. If you can't understand the purpose of any part, please ask me
    – Akshay Nambiar
    Jun 9 at 1:44













up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1





This program is used to find the nodes in a grid network, between which, if an edge is added, the average shortest path length of the entire grid reduces by the most.



"Average shortest path length" is the statistic computed by the NetworkX function average_shortest_path_length, that is, $$ sum_s,t∈V d(s, t) over n(n-1) $$ where $V$ is the set of nodes, $n = left|Vright|$ is the number of nodes, and $d(s, t)$ is the length of the shortest path from $s$ to $t$.



My original program was taking a long time to execute so I decided to make a multiprocessing program, but it is taking even more time than the original one.



So the function that is called by the processes needs to return three values: distance, node1, and node2; and so I used three queues for that. Now I need to get the values of node1 and node2 for which the distance is minimum(of the four processes. I used a while and a for loop just to get those two nodes.



I believe this must be the reason for the slow execution of my program. So is there a better way to get the nodes with minimum distance?



import networkx as nx
import itertools

no_of_nodes = 4

no_of_links = 4

#generates a grid of size specified
G = nx.grid_graph(dim=[no_of_nodes,no_of_nodes], periodic=False)

#for APL
distance=nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)

#to keep track of how many links have been added
nloops=1

def f(l1,l2, q, r, s):

distance=nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)
for x,y in itertools.product(range(no_of_nodes), range(no_of_nodes)):
for i,j in itertools.product(range(l1,l2), range(no_of_nodes)):
#if loop to prevent self loops and multilinks
if (i,j) not in G[(x,y)] and (i,j)!=(x,y):
G.add_edge((x, y), (i, j))
newdistance= nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)
G.remove_edge((x, y), (i, j))
if newdistance<distance:
distance= newdistance
node1a=x
node1b=y
node2a=i
node2b=j

q.put(distance)
r.put((node1a, node1b))
s.put((node2a, node2b))


while nloops<=llno:
if __name__ == '__main__':
q = Queue()
r = Queue()
s = Queue()

p1 = Process(target=f, args=(0, no_of_nodes/4, q, r, s))
p1.start()
p2 = Process(target=f, args=(no_of_nodes/4, no_of_nodes/2, q, r, s))
p2.start()
p3 = Process(target=f, args=(no_of_nodes/2, 3*no_of_nodes/4, q, r, s))
p3.start()
p4 = Process(target=f, args=(3*no_of_nodes/4, no_of_nodes, q, r, s))
p4.start()

min_d = 100
count = 0
dists=
nodesa=
nodesb=

while count<4:
dists.append(q.get())
nodesa.append(r.get())
nodesb.append(s.get())
count+=1
for x in range(4):
if dists[x]<min_d:
min_d=dists[x]
n1a=nodesa[x]
n2a=nodesb[x]
print (min_d, n1a, n2a)
G.add_edge(n1a, n2a)


In the sequential solution, it was possible to find the nodes with minimum distance from the function itself, unlike multiprocessing where it can't be found from the function because I need all possible cases from the four processes.



import networkx as nx
import itertools

no_of_nodes = 4

no_of_links = 4

#generates a grid of size specified
G = nx.grid_graph(dim=[no_of_nodes,no_of_nodes], periodic=False)

#for APL
distance=nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)

#to keep track of how many links have been added
nloops=1

while nloops<=llno:
for x,y in itertools.product(range(no_of_nodes), range(no_of_nodes)):
for i,j in itertools.product(range(x,no_of_nodes), range(no_of_nodes)):
#if loop to prevent self loops and multilinks
if (i,j) not in G[(x,y)] and (i,j)!=(x,y):
G.add_edge((x, y), (i, j))
newdistance= nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)
if newdistance<distance:
distance= newdistance
node1a=x
node1b=y
node2a=i
node2b=j
#removes the last added edge
G.remove_edge((x, y), (i, j))

print "minimum APL = ",distance, " node 1 =",(node1a, node1b), " node 2=" ,(node2a, node2b)
G.add_edge((node1a, node1b), (node2a, node2b))

nloops+=1






share|improve this question













This program is used to find the nodes in a grid network, between which, if an edge is added, the average shortest path length of the entire grid reduces by the most.



"Average shortest path length" is the statistic computed by the NetworkX function average_shortest_path_length, that is, $$ sum_s,t∈V d(s, t) over n(n-1) $$ where $V$ is the set of nodes, $n = left|Vright|$ is the number of nodes, and $d(s, t)$ is the length of the shortest path from $s$ to $t$.



My original program was taking a long time to execute so I decided to make a multiprocessing program, but it is taking even more time than the original one.



So the function that is called by the processes needs to return three values: distance, node1, and node2; and so I used three queues for that. Now I need to get the values of node1 and node2 for which the distance is minimum(of the four processes. I used a while and a for loop just to get those two nodes.



I believe this must be the reason for the slow execution of my program. So is there a better way to get the nodes with minimum distance?



import networkx as nx
import itertools

no_of_nodes = 4

no_of_links = 4

#generates a grid of size specified
G = nx.grid_graph(dim=[no_of_nodes,no_of_nodes], periodic=False)

#for APL
distance=nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)

#to keep track of how many links have been added
nloops=1

def f(l1,l2, q, r, s):

distance=nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)
for x,y in itertools.product(range(no_of_nodes), range(no_of_nodes)):
for i,j in itertools.product(range(l1,l2), range(no_of_nodes)):
#if loop to prevent self loops and multilinks
if (i,j) not in G[(x,y)] and (i,j)!=(x,y):
G.add_edge((x, y), (i, j))
newdistance= nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)
G.remove_edge((x, y), (i, j))
if newdistance<distance:
distance= newdistance
node1a=x
node1b=y
node2a=i
node2b=j

q.put(distance)
r.put((node1a, node1b))
s.put((node2a, node2b))


while nloops<=llno:
if __name__ == '__main__':
q = Queue()
r = Queue()
s = Queue()

p1 = Process(target=f, args=(0, no_of_nodes/4, q, r, s))
p1.start()
p2 = Process(target=f, args=(no_of_nodes/4, no_of_nodes/2, q, r, s))
p2.start()
p3 = Process(target=f, args=(no_of_nodes/2, 3*no_of_nodes/4, q, r, s))
p3.start()
p4 = Process(target=f, args=(3*no_of_nodes/4, no_of_nodes, q, r, s))
p4.start()

min_d = 100
count = 0
dists=
nodesa=
nodesb=

while count<4:
dists.append(q.get())
nodesa.append(r.get())
nodesb.append(s.get())
count+=1
for x in range(4):
if dists[x]<min_d:
min_d=dists[x]
n1a=nodesa[x]
n2a=nodesb[x]
print (min_d, n1a, n2a)
G.add_edge(n1a, n2a)


In the sequential solution, it was possible to find the nodes with minimum distance from the function itself, unlike multiprocessing where it can't be found from the function because I need all possible cases from the four processes.



import networkx as nx
import itertools

no_of_nodes = 4

no_of_links = 4

#generates a grid of size specified
G = nx.grid_graph(dim=[no_of_nodes,no_of_nodes], periodic=False)

#for APL
distance=nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)

#to keep track of how many links have been added
nloops=1

while nloops<=llno:
for x,y in itertools.product(range(no_of_nodes), range(no_of_nodes)):
for i,j in itertools.product(range(x,no_of_nodes), range(no_of_nodes)):
#if loop to prevent self loops and multilinks
if (i,j) not in G[(x,y)] and (i,j)!=(x,y):
G.add_edge((x, y), (i, j))
newdistance= nx.average_shortest_path_length(G)
if newdistance<distance:
distance= newdistance
node1a=x
node1b=y
node2a=i
node2b=j
#removes the last added edge
G.remove_edge((x, y), (i, j))

print "minimum APL = ",distance, " node 1 =",(node1a, node1b), " node 2=" ,(node2a, node2b)
G.add_edge((node1a, node1b), (node2a, node2b))

nloops+=1








share|improve this question












share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 9 at 9:04









Gareth Rees

41k394166




41k394166









asked Jun 8 at 17:57









Akshay Nambiar

212




212











  • This code is at least missing the proper imports.
    – Mast
    Jun 8 at 18:35










  • this is not the full code, it's just a part of it. And the code is working fine, I just want it to execute faster
    – Akshay Nambiar
    Jun 8 at 18:45







  • 4




    If you want a proper review, showing the full code is definitely preferred if not required. Uploading only an example leaves us guessing at some of your intentions which may render the given advice useless.
    – Mast
    Jun 8 at 18:52






  • 1




    okay guys, I have added the entire code, hope this helps. If you can't understand the purpose of any part, please ask me
    – Akshay Nambiar
    Jun 9 at 1:44

















  • This code is at least missing the proper imports.
    – Mast
    Jun 8 at 18:35










  • this is not the full code, it's just a part of it. And the code is working fine, I just want it to execute faster
    – Akshay Nambiar
    Jun 8 at 18:45







  • 4




    If you want a proper review, showing the full code is definitely preferred if not required. Uploading only an example leaves us guessing at some of your intentions which may render the given advice useless.
    – Mast
    Jun 8 at 18:52






  • 1




    okay guys, I have added the entire code, hope this helps. If you can't understand the purpose of any part, please ask me
    – Akshay Nambiar
    Jun 9 at 1:44
















This code is at least missing the proper imports.
– Mast
Jun 8 at 18:35




This code is at least missing the proper imports.
– Mast
Jun 8 at 18:35












this is not the full code, it's just a part of it. And the code is working fine, I just want it to execute faster
– Akshay Nambiar
Jun 8 at 18:45





this is not the full code, it's just a part of it. And the code is working fine, I just want it to execute faster
– Akshay Nambiar
Jun 8 at 18:45





4




4




If you want a proper review, showing the full code is definitely preferred if not required. Uploading only an example leaves us guessing at some of your intentions which may render the given advice useless.
– Mast
Jun 8 at 18:52




If you want a proper review, showing the full code is definitely preferred if not required. Uploading only an example leaves us guessing at some of your intentions which may render the given advice useless.
– Mast
Jun 8 at 18:52




1




1




okay guys, I have added the entire code, hope this helps. If you can't understand the purpose of any part, please ask me
– Akshay Nambiar
Jun 9 at 1:44





okay guys, I have added the entire code, hope this helps. If you can't understand the purpose of any part, please ask me
– Akshay Nambiar
Jun 9 at 1:44
















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f196129%2fadd-an-edge-to-a-graph-to-minimize-the-average-shortest-path-length%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f196129%2fadd-an-edge-to-a-graph-to-minimize-the-average-shortest-path-length%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Popular posts from this blog

Chat program with C++ and SFML

Function to Return a JSON Like Objects Using VBA Collections and Arrays

Will my employers contract hold up in court?