Single method string formatter

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Because I don't want to download an entire library for a single function (which I do understand, was made better than I made mine), I decided to implement my own string formatting function.
I am not very proud of it, as I find it pretty ugly and unreadable.
This is only a string formatter with string-only arguments.
Efficiency is not a concern for me.
#include<iostream>
#include<unordered_map>
#include<string>
using std::string;
string formatString(string format, const std::unordered_map<string, string>& args)
string ret;
string::size_type bracketLoc;
while((bracketLoc = format.find_first_of('')) != string::npos)
// Handling the escape character.
if(bracketLoc > 0 && format[bracketLoc - 1] == '\')
ret += format.substr(0, bracketLoc + 1);
format = format.substr(bracketLoc + 1);
continue;
ret += format.substr(0, bracketLoc);
format = format.substr(bracketLoc + 1);
bracketLoc = format.find_first_of('');
string arg = format.substr(0, bracketLoc);
format = format.substr(bracketLoc + 1);
auto it = args.find(arg);
if(it == args.end())
ret += "(nil)";
else
ret += it->second;
ret += format;
return ret;
int main()
std::cout << formatString("Hello, Name! WeatherType weather, right?",
"Name", "Midnightas",
"Fruit", "Apple"
);
return 0;
Compile with -std=c++11.
The above program will output Hello, Midnightas! (nil) weather, right?.
c++ formatting
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Because I don't want to download an entire library for a single function (which I do understand, was made better than I made mine), I decided to implement my own string formatting function.
I am not very proud of it, as I find it pretty ugly and unreadable.
This is only a string formatter with string-only arguments.
Efficiency is not a concern for me.
#include<iostream>
#include<unordered_map>
#include<string>
using std::string;
string formatString(string format, const std::unordered_map<string, string>& args)
string ret;
string::size_type bracketLoc;
while((bracketLoc = format.find_first_of('')) != string::npos)
// Handling the escape character.
if(bracketLoc > 0 && format[bracketLoc - 1] == '\')
ret += format.substr(0, bracketLoc + 1);
format = format.substr(bracketLoc + 1);
continue;
ret += format.substr(0, bracketLoc);
format = format.substr(bracketLoc + 1);
bracketLoc = format.find_first_of('');
string arg = format.substr(0, bracketLoc);
format = format.substr(bracketLoc + 1);
auto it = args.find(arg);
if(it == args.end())
ret += "(nil)";
else
ret += it->second;
ret += format;
return ret;
int main()
std::cout << formatString("Hello, Name! WeatherType weather, right?",
"Name", "Midnightas",
"Fruit", "Apple"
);
return 0;
Compile with -std=c++11.
The above program will output Hello, Midnightas! (nil) weather, right?.
c++ formatting
No worries, it started out fine, but now it's great. Please try to keep roughly the same format when you'll post new questions. On the more technical note, you might want to have a look at my answer to another post, as well as fmtlib, which seems to be on its way into standard.
â Incomputable
May 26 at 16:36
Yeah, that's the "entire library" that I meant, and I'm not really planning on using versions newer than C++11 as it's standard library does enough for me (Except for this).
â Midnightas
May 26 at 16:40
I don't understand how you arrived at the conclusion that the standard library can't do this. Maybe it's an issue of terminology. Maybe you mean to implement a string templating feature. Because both C and C++ can definitely already format strings.
â Reinderien
May 26 at 16:58
@Reinderien I made this because the standard library doesn't support named arguments afaik.
â Midnightas
May 26 at 17:03
Most libraries use positional rather than named overloads. ie"This is %2 of %1n", where%2is replaced with the second argument and%1is replaced with the first argument. Not sure if named arguments helps that much.
â Martin York
May 26 at 17:25
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Because I don't want to download an entire library for a single function (which I do understand, was made better than I made mine), I decided to implement my own string formatting function.
I am not very proud of it, as I find it pretty ugly and unreadable.
This is only a string formatter with string-only arguments.
Efficiency is not a concern for me.
#include<iostream>
#include<unordered_map>
#include<string>
using std::string;
string formatString(string format, const std::unordered_map<string, string>& args)
string ret;
string::size_type bracketLoc;
while((bracketLoc = format.find_first_of('')) != string::npos)
// Handling the escape character.
if(bracketLoc > 0 && format[bracketLoc - 1] == '\')
ret += format.substr(0, bracketLoc + 1);
format = format.substr(bracketLoc + 1);
continue;
ret += format.substr(0, bracketLoc);
format = format.substr(bracketLoc + 1);
bracketLoc = format.find_first_of('');
string arg = format.substr(0, bracketLoc);
format = format.substr(bracketLoc + 1);
auto it = args.find(arg);
if(it == args.end())
ret += "(nil)";
else
ret += it->second;
ret += format;
return ret;
int main()
std::cout << formatString("Hello, Name! WeatherType weather, right?",
"Name", "Midnightas",
"Fruit", "Apple"
);
return 0;
Compile with -std=c++11.
The above program will output Hello, Midnightas! (nil) weather, right?.
c++ formatting
Because I don't want to download an entire library for a single function (which I do understand, was made better than I made mine), I decided to implement my own string formatting function.
I am not very proud of it, as I find it pretty ugly and unreadable.
This is only a string formatter with string-only arguments.
Efficiency is not a concern for me.
#include<iostream>
#include<unordered_map>
#include<string>
using std::string;
string formatString(string format, const std::unordered_map<string, string>& args)
string ret;
string::size_type bracketLoc;
while((bracketLoc = format.find_first_of('')) != string::npos)
// Handling the escape character.
if(bracketLoc > 0 && format[bracketLoc - 1] == '\')
ret += format.substr(0, bracketLoc + 1);
format = format.substr(bracketLoc + 1);
continue;
ret += format.substr(0, bracketLoc);
format = format.substr(bracketLoc + 1);
bracketLoc = format.find_first_of('');
string arg = format.substr(0, bracketLoc);
format = format.substr(bracketLoc + 1);
auto it = args.find(arg);
if(it == args.end())
ret += "(nil)";
else
ret += it->second;
ret += format;
return ret;
int main()
std::cout << formatString("Hello, Name! WeatherType weather, right?",
"Name", "Midnightas",
"Fruit", "Apple"
);
return 0;
Compile with -std=c++11.
The above program will output Hello, Midnightas! (nil) weather, right?.
c++ formatting
edited May 26 at 16:20
asked May 26 at 15:23
Midnightas
1185
1185
No worries, it started out fine, but now it's great. Please try to keep roughly the same format when you'll post new questions. On the more technical note, you might want to have a look at my answer to another post, as well as fmtlib, which seems to be on its way into standard.
â Incomputable
May 26 at 16:36
Yeah, that's the "entire library" that I meant, and I'm not really planning on using versions newer than C++11 as it's standard library does enough for me (Except for this).
â Midnightas
May 26 at 16:40
I don't understand how you arrived at the conclusion that the standard library can't do this. Maybe it's an issue of terminology. Maybe you mean to implement a string templating feature. Because both C and C++ can definitely already format strings.
â Reinderien
May 26 at 16:58
@Reinderien I made this because the standard library doesn't support named arguments afaik.
â Midnightas
May 26 at 17:03
Most libraries use positional rather than named overloads. ie"This is %2 of %1n", where%2is replaced with the second argument and%1is replaced with the first argument. Not sure if named arguments helps that much.
â Martin York
May 26 at 17:25
 |Â
show 1 more comment
No worries, it started out fine, but now it's great. Please try to keep roughly the same format when you'll post new questions. On the more technical note, you might want to have a look at my answer to another post, as well as fmtlib, which seems to be on its way into standard.
â Incomputable
May 26 at 16:36
Yeah, that's the "entire library" that I meant, and I'm not really planning on using versions newer than C++11 as it's standard library does enough for me (Except for this).
â Midnightas
May 26 at 16:40
I don't understand how you arrived at the conclusion that the standard library can't do this. Maybe it's an issue of terminology. Maybe you mean to implement a string templating feature. Because both C and C++ can definitely already format strings.
â Reinderien
May 26 at 16:58
@Reinderien I made this because the standard library doesn't support named arguments afaik.
â Midnightas
May 26 at 17:03
Most libraries use positional rather than named overloads. ie"This is %2 of %1n", where%2is replaced with the second argument and%1is replaced with the first argument. Not sure if named arguments helps that much.
â Martin York
May 26 at 17:25
No worries, it started out fine, but now it's great. Please try to keep roughly the same format when you'll post new questions. On the more technical note, you might want to have a look at my answer to another post, as well as fmtlib, which seems to be on its way into standard.
â Incomputable
May 26 at 16:36
No worries, it started out fine, but now it's great. Please try to keep roughly the same format when you'll post new questions. On the more technical note, you might want to have a look at my answer to another post, as well as fmtlib, which seems to be on its way into standard.
â Incomputable
May 26 at 16:36
Yeah, that's the "entire library" that I meant, and I'm not really planning on using versions newer than C++11 as it's standard library does enough for me (Except for this).
â Midnightas
May 26 at 16:40
Yeah, that's the "entire library" that I meant, and I'm not really planning on using versions newer than C++11 as it's standard library does enough for me (Except for this).
â Midnightas
May 26 at 16:40
I don't understand how you arrived at the conclusion that the standard library can't do this. Maybe it's an issue of terminology. Maybe you mean to implement a string templating feature. Because both C and C++ can definitely already format strings.
â Reinderien
May 26 at 16:58
I don't understand how you arrived at the conclusion that the standard library can't do this. Maybe it's an issue of terminology. Maybe you mean to implement a string templating feature. Because both C and C++ can definitely already format strings.
â Reinderien
May 26 at 16:58
@Reinderien I made this because the standard library doesn't support named arguments afaik.
â Midnightas
May 26 at 17:03
@Reinderien I made this because the standard library doesn't support named arguments afaik.
â Midnightas
May 26 at 17:03
Most libraries use positional rather than named overloads. ie
"This is %2 of %1n", where %2 is replaced with the second argument and %1 is replaced with the first argument. Not sure if named arguments helps that much.â Martin York
May 26 at 17:25
Most libraries use positional rather than named overloads. ie
"This is %2 of %1n", where %2 is replaced with the second argument and %1 is replaced with the first argument. Not sure if named arguments helps that much.â Martin York
May 26 at 17:25
 |Â
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You have a problem if you want to have the escape-character immediately before a replacement, because you don't support escaping the escape-character.
I suggest dispensing with escape-characters, and simply replace an empty replacementwith an opening brace{.There's no reason to modify the format-string at all, and thus receiving it by copy. Doing so is supremely inefficient. Well, using named arguments at all already is, so it might not matter too much.
Do you know the ternary operator
cond ? true_exp : false_exp? Using it would simplify things.Avoid allocations, thus avoid
std::string. At least the format string should be C++17std::string_view, maybe also the map should be too.
If you template it, you don't even really have to decide for the caller:template <class Args = std::unordered_map<std::string_view, std::string_view>>
std::string formatString(std::string_view format, const Args& args)
Where would the ternary operator help here, other than when checking the existence of an argument?
â Midnightas
May 26 at 18:12
Just as you said, at the end of the loop when deciding what to add.
â Deduplicator
May 26 at 18:15
Some things I can't do here since I'm using C++11, but thanks!
â Midnightas
May 26 at 19:08
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You have a problem if you want to have the escape-character immediately before a replacement, because you don't support escaping the escape-character.
I suggest dispensing with escape-characters, and simply replace an empty replacementwith an opening brace{.There's no reason to modify the format-string at all, and thus receiving it by copy. Doing so is supremely inefficient. Well, using named arguments at all already is, so it might not matter too much.
Do you know the ternary operator
cond ? true_exp : false_exp? Using it would simplify things.Avoid allocations, thus avoid
std::string. At least the format string should be C++17std::string_view, maybe also the map should be too.
If you template it, you don't even really have to decide for the caller:template <class Args = std::unordered_map<std::string_view, std::string_view>>
std::string formatString(std::string_view format, const Args& args)
Where would the ternary operator help here, other than when checking the existence of an argument?
â Midnightas
May 26 at 18:12
Just as you said, at the end of the loop when deciding what to add.
â Deduplicator
May 26 at 18:15
Some things I can't do here since I'm using C++11, but thanks!
â Midnightas
May 26 at 19:08
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You have a problem if you want to have the escape-character immediately before a replacement, because you don't support escaping the escape-character.
I suggest dispensing with escape-characters, and simply replace an empty replacementwith an opening brace{.There's no reason to modify the format-string at all, and thus receiving it by copy. Doing so is supremely inefficient. Well, using named arguments at all already is, so it might not matter too much.
Do you know the ternary operator
cond ? true_exp : false_exp? Using it would simplify things.Avoid allocations, thus avoid
std::string. At least the format string should be C++17std::string_view, maybe also the map should be too.
If you template it, you don't even really have to decide for the caller:template <class Args = std::unordered_map<std::string_view, std::string_view>>
std::string formatString(std::string_view format, const Args& args)
Where would the ternary operator help here, other than when checking the existence of an argument?
â Midnightas
May 26 at 18:12
Just as you said, at the end of the loop when deciding what to add.
â Deduplicator
May 26 at 18:15
Some things I can't do here since I'm using C++11, but thanks!
â Midnightas
May 26 at 19:08
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You have a problem if you want to have the escape-character immediately before a replacement, because you don't support escaping the escape-character.
I suggest dispensing with escape-characters, and simply replace an empty replacementwith an opening brace{.There's no reason to modify the format-string at all, and thus receiving it by copy. Doing so is supremely inefficient. Well, using named arguments at all already is, so it might not matter too much.
Do you know the ternary operator
cond ? true_exp : false_exp? Using it would simplify things.Avoid allocations, thus avoid
std::string. At least the format string should be C++17std::string_view, maybe also the map should be too.
If you template it, you don't even really have to decide for the caller:template <class Args = std::unordered_map<std::string_view, std::string_view>>
std::string formatString(std::string_view format, const Args& args)
You have a problem if you want to have the escape-character immediately before a replacement, because you don't support escaping the escape-character.
I suggest dispensing with escape-characters, and simply replace an empty replacementwith an opening brace{.There's no reason to modify the format-string at all, and thus receiving it by copy. Doing so is supremely inefficient. Well, using named arguments at all already is, so it might not matter too much.
Do you know the ternary operator
cond ? true_exp : false_exp? Using it would simplify things.Avoid allocations, thus avoid
std::string. At least the format string should be C++17std::string_view, maybe also the map should be too.
If you template it, you don't even really have to decide for the caller:template <class Args = std::unordered_map<std::string_view, std::string_view>>
std::string formatString(std::string_view format, const Args& args)
answered May 26 at 17:50
Deduplicator
9,7511744
9,7511744
Where would the ternary operator help here, other than when checking the existence of an argument?
â Midnightas
May 26 at 18:12
Just as you said, at the end of the loop when deciding what to add.
â Deduplicator
May 26 at 18:15
Some things I can't do here since I'm using C++11, but thanks!
â Midnightas
May 26 at 19:08
add a comment |Â
Where would the ternary operator help here, other than when checking the existence of an argument?
â Midnightas
May 26 at 18:12
Just as you said, at the end of the loop when deciding what to add.
â Deduplicator
May 26 at 18:15
Some things I can't do here since I'm using C++11, but thanks!
â Midnightas
May 26 at 19:08
Where would the ternary operator help here, other than when checking the existence of an argument?
â Midnightas
May 26 at 18:12
Where would the ternary operator help here, other than when checking the existence of an argument?
â Midnightas
May 26 at 18:12
Just as you said, at the end of the loop when deciding what to add.
â Deduplicator
May 26 at 18:15
Just as you said, at the end of the loop when deciding what to add.
â Deduplicator
May 26 at 18:15
Some things I can't do here since I'm using C++11, but thanks!
â Midnightas
May 26 at 19:08
Some things I can't do here since I'm using C++11, but thanks!
â Midnightas
May 26 at 19:08
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f195223%2fsingle-method-string-formatter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
No worries, it started out fine, but now it's great. Please try to keep roughly the same format when you'll post new questions. On the more technical note, you might want to have a look at my answer to another post, as well as fmtlib, which seems to be on its way into standard.
â Incomputable
May 26 at 16:36
Yeah, that's the "entire library" that I meant, and I'm not really planning on using versions newer than C++11 as it's standard library does enough for me (Except for this).
â Midnightas
May 26 at 16:40
I don't understand how you arrived at the conclusion that the standard library can't do this. Maybe it's an issue of terminology. Maybe you mean to implement a string templating feature. Because both C and C++ can definitely already format strings.
â Reinderien
May 26 at 16:58
@Reinderien I made this because the standard library doesn't support named arguments afaik.
â Midnightas
May 26 at 17:03
Most libraries use positional rather than named overloads. ie
"This is %2 of %1n", where%2is replaced with the second argument and%1is replaced with the first argument. Not sure if named arguments helps that much.â Martin York
May 26 at 17:25