Truffle Javascript test in Mocha framework

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












This is a Truffle test written in Javascript using Mocha test framework. It tests my Solidity smart contract ArbitrableBlacklist.
To be able to test an internal function, I inherited ArbitrableBlacklist from ExposedArbitrableBlacklist and used that contract instead.
I would like to hear your comments about what could be improved in this test file to make it more readible and concise or simply a better test.



/* eslint-disable no-undef */ // Avoid the linter considering truffle elements as undef.

const 
 expectThrow,
 increaseTime
 = require('../helpers/utils')
const ArbitrableBlacklist = artifacts.require('./ArbitrableBlacklist.sol')
const ExposedArbitrableBlacklist = artifacts.require('./ExposedArbitrableBlacklist.sol')
const CentralizedArbitrator = artifacts.require('./CentralizedArbitrator.sol')
const Item = artifacts.require('./ArbitrableBlacklist.sol')
const NOT_PAYABLE_VALUE = (2 ** 64 - 2) / 2

contract('ArbitrableBlacklist', function(accounts) )



javascript unit-testing mocha




share|improve this question



























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    This is a Truffle test written in Javascript using Mocha test framework. It tests my Solidity smart contract ArbitrableBlacklist.
    To be able to test an internal function, I inherited ArbitrableBlacklist from ExposedArbitrableBlacklist and used that contract instead.
    I would like to hear your comments about what could be improved in this test file to make it more readible and concise or simply a better test.



    /* eslint-disable no-undef */ // Avoid the linter considering truffle elements as undef.

    const 
     expectThrow,
     increaseTime
     = require('../helpers/utils')
    const ArbitrableBlacklist = artifacts.require('./ArbitrableBlacklist.sol')
    const ExposedArbitrableBlacklist = artifacts.require('./ExposedArbitrableBlacklist.sol')
    const CentralizedArbitrator = artifacts.require('./CentralizedArbitrator.sol')
    const Item = artifacts.require('./ArbitrableBlacklist.sol')
    const NOT_PAYABLE_VALUE = (2 ** 64 - 2) / 2

    contract('ArbitrableBlacklist', function(accounts) )



    javascript unit-testing mocha




    share|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      This is a Truffle test written in Javascript using Mocha test framework. It tests my Solidity smart contract ArbitrableBlacklist.
      To be able to test an internal function, I inherited ArbitrableBlacklist from ExposedArbitrableBlacklist and used that contract instead.
      I would like to hear your comments about what could be improved in this test file to make it more readible and concise or simply a better test.



      /* eslint-disable no-undef */ // Avoid the linter considering truffle elements as undef.

      const 
       expectThrow,
       increaseTime
       = require('../helpers/utils')
      const ArbitrableBlacklist = artifacts.require('./ArbitrableBlacklist.sol')
      const ExposedArbitrableBlacklist = artifacts.require('./ExposedArbitrableBlacklist.sol')
      const CentralizedArbitrator = artifacts.require('./CentralizedArbitrator.sol')
      const Item = artifacts.require('./ArbitrableBlacklist.sol')
      const NOT_PAYABLE_VALUE = (2 ** 64 - 2) / 2

      contract('ArbitrableBlacklist', function(accounts) )



      javascript unit-testing mocha




      share|improve this question













      This is a Truffle test written in Javascript using Mocha test framework. It tests my Solidity smart contract ArbitrableBlacklist.
      To be able to test an internal function, I inherited ArbitrableBlacklist from ExposedArbitrableBlacklist and used that contract instead.
      I would like to hear your comments about what could be improved in this test file to make it more readible and concise or simply a better test.



      /* eslint-disable no-undef */ // Avoid the linter considering truffle elements as undef.

      const 
       expectThrow,
       increaseTime
       = require('../helpers/utils')
      const ArbitrableBlacklist = artifacts.require('./ArbitrableBlacklist.sol')
      const ExposedArbitrableBlacklist = artifacts.require('./ExposedArbitrableBlacklist.sol')
      const CentralizedArbitrator = artifacts.require('./CentralizedArbitrator.sol')
      const Item = artifacts.require('./ArbitrableBlacklist.sol')
      const NOT_PAYABLE_VALUE = (2 ** 64 - 2) / 2

      contract('ArbitrableBlacklist', function(accounts) )




      javascript unit-testing mocha





      share|improve this question












      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jun 23 at 9:43









      t3chb0t

      31.9k54095




      31.9k54095









      asked Jun 23 at 7:38









      ferit

      1012




      1012

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f197108%2ftruffle-javascript-test-in-mocha-framework%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






















          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f197108%2ftruffle-javascript-test-in-mocha-framework%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest
































































          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Chat program with C++ and SFML

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 2 down vote favorite This is my client code: (My server is very similar at the moment but I will upload it below this one just in case somebody wants to run it) #include <SFML/Graphics.hpp> #include <SFML/Network.hpp> #include <thread> int main() sf::RenderWindow main_win(sf::VideoMode(800, 800), "Chatcy!"); main_win.setPosition(sf::Vector2i(sf::VideoMode::getDesktopMode().width/2 -400, sf::VideoMode::getDesktopMode().height/2 -400)); main_win.setVerticalSyncEnabled(true); //chatcy logo sf::Texture chatcy; chatcy.loadFromFile("image_chatcy.png"); sf::Sprite logo; logo.setTexture(chatcy); //200x800 //font sf::Font font; font.loadFromFile("FreeSerif.ttf"); //name sf::String name("Client"); name += ": "; //text input area and background sf::RectangleShape in_backg...
          Read more

          Function to Return a JSON Like Objects Using VBA Collections and Arrays

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 1 down vote favorite My goal is to create a compact function that can create a JSON Like object from JSON string. I want a function with a small footprint that I or anyone who wants to use it, can simply paste into a module and use. At 61 lines of code, I am happy with its size and portability. Here is an image of JSON Object created from string data using a ScriptControl . Although the Locals Window displays the properties and values correctly, the object itself is extremely difficult to work with. This image shows an object created using getJSONCollection . Because it is made of VBA Collections and Arrays, it is very easy to work with. Option Explicit Private Function getJSONCollection(ByVal Value As Variant, Optional ScriptEngine As Object) As Variant Const DELIMITER As String = "||" Dim col As Collection, JSON As Object, KeyNam...
          Read more

          Will my employers contract hold up in court?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 8 down vote favorite 2 When I started a new job back in July of 2017, I signed a contract that had the following bindings or restrictions if I was ever to leave the company: Cannot work for a competitor within 25 miles of current companies location for the next two years Cannot offer my services to any organization within 25 miles of current companies location for the next two years Now, when mentioned “my services” this can be related to my profession of website design. This contract seems incredibly binding, 2 years in length, and I’m looking to see if it would actually hold up in an Arizona court. contract employment non-compete arizona share | improve this question edited Aug 7 at 15:35 feetwet ♦ 13.8k 9 37 85 asked Aug 6 at 19:05 Alex S. 46 2 What does your comp...
          Read more