Convert numbers from base X to base Y

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
5
down vote

favorite












I recently wrote a piece of code to convert between two bases of X, (Where 26 > X > 0). I was mighty proud that I did this. And then I started wondering, am I using modern coding conventions/practices?



The code can be found here.



And some sample outputs are shown:



// syntax: convertBase(input, inputBase, outputBase)
convertBase("10", 10, 11) // "a"
convertBase("3", 10, 3) // "10"
convertBase("4", 10, 3) // "11"


The full code is here:



function convertBase(inNumber, inBase, outputBase) 
var result = ;
if (typeof inNumber !== "number" && typeof inNumber !== "string")
throw new Error("You input is not a number or a string.");

var encodings = ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"];
if (typeof inNumber === "number")
inNumber = JSON.stringify(inNumber);

if (inBase === outputBase)
return inNumber;

inNumber = inNumber.toLowerCase();
inNumber = inNumber.split("").map(function(item)
return encodings.indexOf(item);
);
inNumber = inNumber.reverse();
inNumber = inNumber.map(function(item, index)
return item * Math.pow(inBase, index);
);
var res = 0;
inNumber.forEach(function(item)
res += item;
return;
);
var ones = res % outputBase;
var remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
var ones = remainder;
var remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;

return result.map(function(item)
return encodings[item];
).join("");

;






share|improve this question





















  • (Where 26 > X > 0). Base 1 does not seem to have much utility.
    – radarbob
    Apr 30 at 19:18











  • @radarbob XD no it does not.
    – FreezePhoenix
    Apr 30 at 19:24
















up vote
5
down vote

favorite












I recently wrote a piece of code to convert between two bases of X, (Where 26 > X > 0). I was mighty proud that I did this. And then I started wondering, am I using modern coding conventions/practices?



The code can be found here.



And some sample outputs are shown:



// syntax: convertBase(input, inputBase, outputBase)
convertBase("10", 10, 11) // "a"
convertBase("3", 10, 3) // "10"
convertBase("4", 10, 3) // "11"


The full code is here:



function convertBase(inNumber, inBase, outputBase) 
var result = ;
if (typeof inNumber !== "number" && typeof inNumber !== "string")
throw new Error("You input is not a number or a string.");

var encodings = ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"];
if (typeof inNumber === "number")
inNumber = JSON.stringify(inNumber);

if (inBase === outputBase)
return inNumber;

inNumber = inNumber.toLowerCase();
inNumber = inNumber.split("").map(function(item)
return encodings.indexOf(item);
);
inNumber = inNumber.reverse();
inNumber = inNumber.map(function(item, index)
return item * Math.pow(inBase, index);
);
var res = 0;
inNumber.forEach(function(item)
res += item;
return;
);
var ones = res % outputBase;
var remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
var ones = remainder;
var remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;

return result.map(function(item)
return encodings[item];
).join("");

;






share|improve this question





















  • (Where 26 > X > 0). Base 1 does not seem to have much utility.
    – radarbob
    Apr 30 at 19:18











  • @radarbob XD no it does not.
    – FreezePhoenix
    Apr 30 at 19:24












up vote
5
down vote

favorite









up vote
5
down vote

favorite











I recently wrote a piece of code to convert between two bases of X, (Where 26 > X > 0). I was mighty proud that I did this. And then I started wondering, am I using modern coding conventions/practices?



The code can be found here.



And some sample outputs are shown:



// syntax: convertBase(input, inputBase, outputBase)
convertBase("10", 10, 11) // "a"
convertBase("3", 10, 3) // "10"
convertBase("4", 10, 3) // "11"


The full code is here:



function convertBase(inNumber, inBase, outputBase) 
var result = ;
if (typeof inNumber !== "number" && typeof inNumber !== "string")
throw new Error("You input is not a number or a string.");

var encodings = ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"];
if (typeof inNumber === "number")
inNumber = JSON.stringify(inNumber);

if (inBase === outputBase)
return inNumber;

inNumber = inNumber.toLowerCase();
inNumber = inNumber.split("").map(function(item)
return encodings.indexOf(item);
);
inNumber = inNumber.reverse();
inNumber = inNumber.map(function(item, index)
return item * Math.pow(inBase, index);
);
var res = 0;
inNumber.forEach(function(item)
res += item;
return;
);
var ones = res % outputBase;
var remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
var ones = remainder;
var remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;

return result.map(function(item)
return encodings[item];
).join("");

;






share|improve this question













I recently wrote a piece of code to convert between two bases of X, (Where 26 > X > 0). I was mighty proud that I did this. And then I started wondering, am I using modern coding conventions/practices?



The code can be found here.



And some sample outputs are shown:



// syntax: convertBase(input, inputBase, outputBase)
convertBase("10", 10, 11) // "a"
convertBase("3", 10, 3) // "10"
convertBase("4", 10, 3) // "11"


The full code is here:



function convertBase(inNumber, inBase, outputBase) 
var result = ;
if (typeof inNumber !== "number" && typeof inNumber !== "string")
throw new Error("You input is not a number or a string.");

var encodings = ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"];
if (typeof inNumber === "number")
inNumber = JSON.stringify(inNumber);

if (inBase === outputBase)
return inNumber;

inNumber = inNumber.toLowerCase();
inNumber = inNumber.split("").map(function(item)
return encodings.indexOf(item);
);
inNumber = inNumber.reverse();
inNumber = inNumber.map(function(item, index)
return item * Math.pow(inBase, index);
);
var res = 0;
inNumber.forEach(function(item)
res += item;
return;
);
var ones = res % outputBase;
var remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
var ones = remainder;
var remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;

return result.map(function(item)
return encodings[item];
).join("");

;








share|improve this question












share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 29 at 5:57









Sam Onela

5,78461544




5,78461544









asked Apr 27 at 21:30









FreezePhoenix

310218




310218











  • (Where 26 > X > 0). Base 1 does not seem to have much utility.
    – radarbob
    Apr 30 at 19:18











  • @radarbob XD no it does not.
    – FreezePhoenix
    Apr 30 at 19:24
















  • (Where 26 > X > 0). Base 1 does not seem to have much utility.
    – radarbob
    Apr 30 at 19:18











  • @radarbob XD no it does not.
    – FreezePhoenix
    Apr 30 at 19:24















(Where 26 > X > 0). Base 1 does not seem to have much utility.
– radarbob
Apr 30 at 19:18





(Where 26 > X > 0). Base 1 does not seem to have much utility.
– radarbob
Apr 30 at 19:18













@radarbob XD no it does not.
– FreezePhoenix
Apr 30 at 19:24




@radarbob XD no it does not.
– FreezePhoenix
Apr 30 at 19:24










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Bug



I tried converting "10' from base 10 to base 2 (i.e. binary) and the output was 250, which is invalid for a base 2 number.



Also, when I ran convertBase("3", 10, 3) the output was 0, not "10"



Your Question




am I using modern coding conventions/practices?




Originally, before I added the javascript tag, this question only had the ecmascript-6 tag. I don't see many features of es-6 in your code, like let and const, arrow functions, default parameters, etc. So judging from an ecmascript-6 point-of-view, I would say No. See the rewrite below which utilizes those features.






const convertBase = (inNumber, inBase = 10, outputBase = 10) => 
let result = ;
if (typeof inNumber !== "number" && typeof inNumber !== "string")
throw new Error("You input is not a number or a string.");

const encodings = ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"];
if (typeof inNumber === "number")
inNumber = JSON.stringify(inNumber);

if (inBase === outputBase)
return inNumber;

inNumber = inNumber.toLowerCase();
inNumber = inNumber.split("").map(item => encodings.indexOf(item));
inNumber = inNumber.reverse();
inNumber = inNumber.map((item, index) => item * Math.pow(inBase, index));
let res = 0;
inNumber.forEach(item => res += item);
let ones = res % outputBase;
let remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
let left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
ones = remainder;
remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
left = remainder > 1;

return result.map(item => encodings[item]).join("");
;
console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):',convertBase("10", 10, 11))





Re-declarations



The code inside the while loop contains variable declarations for variables declared outside the loop:




var ones = res % outputBase;
var remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
var ones = remainder;
var remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;




While the Javascript engine won't "chuck a wobbly1"2 (though somebody who has to update your code might), those assignment statements inside the while loop could exist without the var keyword, and for the sake of readability, probably should not have var at the beginning.



Simplification



The first versions of Ecmascript (i.e. 1 and 5) have had parseInt() and Number.prototype.toString(), which should be enough to implement the desired functionality (though note that the supported base values are 2-36, not 0-26).






const convertBase = (inputNumber, inputBase = 10, outputBase = 10) =>
parseInt(inputNumber, inputBase).toString(outputBase);

console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):', convertBase("10", 10, 11)); // "a"
console.log('convertBase("3", 10, 3):', convertBase("3", 10, 3)); // "10"
console.log('convertBase("4", 10, 3):', convertBase("4", 10, 3)); // "11"
console.log('convertBase(10, 10, 2):', convertBase(10, 10, 2)); // "1010"





1http://spencertipping.com/js-in-ten-minutes/js-in-ten-minutes.pdf2https://english.stackexchange.com/a/129277/213844






share|improve this answer























  • *frowns* Looks like I didn't debug well.
    – FreezePhoenix
    Apr 29 at 13:23










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193118%2fconvert-numbers-from-base-x-to-base-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Bug



I tried converting "10' from base 10 to base 2 (i.e. binary) and the output was 250, which is invalid for a base 2 number.



Also, when I ran convertBase("3", 10, 3) the output was 0, not "10"



Your Question




am I using modern coding conventions/practices?




Originally, before I added the javascript tag, this question only had the ecmascript-6 tag. I don't see many features of es-6 in your code, like let and const, arrow functions, default parameters, etc. So judging from an ecmascript-6 point-of-view, I would say No. See the rewrite below which utilizes those features.






const convertBase = (inNumber, inBase = 10, outputBase = 10) => 
let result = ;
if (typeof inNumber !== "number" && typeof inNumber !== "string")
throw new Error("You input is not a number or a string.");

const encodings = ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"];
if (typeof inNumber === "number")
inNumber = JSON.stringify(inNumber);

if (inBase === outputBase)
return inNumber;

inNumber = inNumber.toLowerCase();
inNumber = inNumber.split("").map(item => encodings.indexOf(item));
inNumber = inNumber.reverse();
inNumber = inNumber.map((item, index) => item * Math.pow(inBase, index));
let res = 0;
inNumber.forEach(item => res += item);
let ones = res % outputBase;
let remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
let left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
ones = remainder;
remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
left = remainder > 1;

return result.map(item => encodings[item]).join("");
;
console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):',convertBase("10", 10, 11))





Re-declarations



The code inside the while loop contains variable declarations for variables declared outside the loop:




var ones = res % outputBase;
var remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
var ones = remainder;
var remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;




While the Javascript engine won't "chuck a wobbly1"2 (though somebody who has to update your code might), those assignment statements inside the while loop could exist without the var keyword, and for the sake of readability, probably should not have var at the beginning.



Simplification



The first versions of Ecmascript (i.e. 1 and 5) have had parseInt() and Number.prototype.toString(), which should be enough to implement the desired functionality (though note that the supported base values are 2-36, not 0-26).






const convertBase = (inputNumber, inputBase = 10, outputBase = 10) =>
parseInt(inputNumber, inputBase).toString(outputBase);

console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):', convertBase("10", 10, 11)); // "a"
console.log('convertBase("3", 10, 3):', convertBase("3", 10, 3)); // "10"
console.log('convertBase("4", 10, 3):', convertBase("4", 10, 3)); // "11"
console.log('convertBase(10, 10, 2):', convertBase(10, 10, 2)); // "1010"





1http://spencertipping.com/js-in-ten-minutes/js-in-ten-minutes.pdf2https://english.stackexchange.com/a/129277/213844






share|improve this answer























  • *frowns* Looks like I didn't debug well.
    – FreezePhoenix
    Apr 29 at 13:23














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Bug



I tried converting "10' from base 10 to base 2 (i.e. binary) and the output was 250, which is invalid for a base 2 number.



Also, when I ran convertBase("3", 10, 3) the output was 0, not "10"



Your Question




am I using modern coding conventions/practices?




Originally, before I added the javascript tag, this question only had the ecmascript-6 tag. I don't see many features of es-6 in your code, like let and const, arrow functions, default parameters, etc. So judging from an ecmascript-6 point-of-view, I would say No. See the rewrite below which utilizes those features.






const convertBase = (inNumber, inBase = 10, outputBase = 10) => 
let result = ;
if (typeof inNumber !== "number" && typeof inNumber !== "string")
throw new Error("You input is not a number or a string.");

const encodings = ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"];
if (typeof inNumber === "number")
inNumber = JSON.stringify(inNumber);

if (inBase === outputBase)
return inNumber;

inNumber = inNumber.toLowerCase();
inNumber = inNumber.split("").map(item => encodings.indexOf(item));
inNumber = inNumber.reverse();
inNumber = inNumber.map((item, index) => item * Math.pow(inBase, index));
let res = 0;
inNumber.forEach(item => res += item);
let ones = res % outputBase;
let remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
let left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
ones = remainder;
remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
left = remainder > 1;

return result.map(item => encodings[item]).join("");
;
console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):',convertBase("10", 10, 11))





Re-declarations



The code inside the while loop contains variable declarations for variables declared outside the loop:




var ones = res % outputBase;
var remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
var ones = remainder;
var remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;




While the Javascript engine won't "chuck a wobbly1"2 (though somebody who has to update your code might), those assignment statements inside the while loop could exist without the var keyword, and for the sake of readability, probably should not have var at the beginning.



Simplification



The first versions of Ecmascript (i.e. 1 and 5) have had parseInt() and Number.prototype.toString(), which should be enough to implement the desired functionality (though note that the supported base values are 2-36, not 0-26).






const convertBase = (inputNumber, inputBase = 10, outputBase = 10) =>
parseInt(inputNumber, inputBase).toString(outputBase);

console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):', convertBase("10", 10, 11)); // "a"
console.log('convertBase("3", 10, 3):', convertBase("3", 10, 3)); // "10"
console.log('convertBase("4", 10, 3):', convertBase("4", 10, 3)); // "11"
console.log('convertBase(10, 10, 2):', convertBase(10, 10, 2)); // "1010"





1http://spencertipping.com/js-in-ten-minutes/js-in-ten-minutes.pdf2https://english.stackexchange.com/a/129277/213844






share|improve this answer























  • *frowns* Looks like I didn't debug well.
    – FreezePhoenix
    Apr 29 at 13:23












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






Bug



I tried converting "10' from base 10 to base 2 (i.e. binary) and the output was 250, which is invalid for a base 2 number.



Also, when I ran convertBase("3", 10, 3) the output was 0, not "10"



Your Question




am I using modern coding conventions/practices?




Originally, before I added the javascript tag, this question only had the ecmascript-6 tag. I don't see many features of es-6 in your code, like let and const, arrow functions, default parameters, etc. So judging from an ecmascript-6 point-of-view, I would say No. See the rewrite below which utilizes those features.






const convertBase = (inNumber, inBase = 10, outputBase = 10) => 
let result = ;
if (typeof inNumber !== "number" && typeof inNumber !== "string")
throw new Error("You input is not a number or a string.");

const encodings = ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"];
if (typeof inNumber === "number")
inNumber = JSON.stringify(inNumber);

if (inBase === outputBase)
return inNumber;

inNumber = inNumber.toLowerCase();
inNumber = inNumber.split("").map(item => encodings.indexOf(item));
inNumber = inNumber.reverse();
inNumber = inNumber.map((item, index) => item * Math.pow(inBase, index));
let res = 0;
inNumber.forEach(item => res += item);
let ones = res % outputBase;
let remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
let left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
ones = remainder;
remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
left = remainder > 1;

return result.map(item => encodings[item]).join("");
;
console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):',convertBase("10", 10, 11))





Re-declarations



The code inside the while loop contains variable declarations for variables declared outside the loop:




var ones = res % outputBase;
var remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
var ones = remainder;
var remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;




While the Javascript engine won't "chuck a wobbly1"2 (though somebody who has to update your code might), those assignment statements inside the while loop could exist without the var keyword, and for the sake of readability, probably should not have var at the beginning.



Simplification



The first versions of Ecmascript (i.e. 1 and 5) have had parseInt() and Number.prototype.toString(), which should be enough to implement the desired functionality (though note that the supported base values are 2-36, not 0-26).






const convertBase = (inputNumber, inputBase = 10, outputBase = 10) =>
parseInt(inputNumber, inputBase).toString(outputBase);

console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):', convertBase("10", 10, 11)); // "a"
console.log('convertBase("3", 10, 3):', convertBase("3", 10, 3)); // "10"
console.log('convertBase("4", 10, 3):', convertBase("4", 10, 3)); // "11"
console.log('convertBase(10, 10, 2):', convertBase(10, 10, 2)); // "1010"





1http://spencertipping.com/js-in-ten-minutes/js-in-ten-minutes.pdf2https://english.stackexchange.com/a/129277/213844






share|improve this answer















Bug



I tried converting "10' from base 10 to base 2 (i.e. binary) and the output was 250, which is invalid for a base 2 number.



Also, when I ran convertBase("3", 10, 3) the output was 0, not "10"



Your Question




am I using modern coding conventions/practices?




Originally, before I added the javascript tag, this question only had the ecmascript-6 tag. I don't see many features of es-6 in your code, like let and const, arrow functions, default parameters, etc. So judging from an ecmascript-6 point-of-view, I would say No. See the rewrite below which utilizes those features.






const convertBase = (inNumber, inBase = 10, outputBase = 10) => 
let result = ;
if (typeof inNumber !== "number" && typeof inNumber !== "string")
throw new Error("You input is not a number or a string.");

const encodings = ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"];
if (typeof inNumber === "number")
inNumber = JSON.stringify(inNumber);

if (inBase === outputBase)
return inNumber;

inNumber = inNumber.toLowerCase();
inNumber = inNumber.split("").map(item => encodings.indexOf(item));
inNumber = inNumber.reverse();
inNumber = inNumber.map((item, index) => item * Math.pow(inBase, index));
let res = 0;
inNumber.forEach(item => res += item);
let ones = res % outputBase;
let remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
let left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
ones = remainder;
remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
left = remainder > 1;

return result.map(item => encodings[item]).join("");
;
console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):',convertBase("10", 10, 11))





Re-declarations



The code inside the while loop contains variable declarations for variables declared outside the loop:




var ones = res % outputBase;
var remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
var ones = remainder;
var remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
var left = remainder > 1;




While the Javascript engine won't "chuck a wobbly1"2 (though somebody who has to update your code might), those assignment statements inside the while loop could exist without the var keyword, and for the sake of readability, probably should not have var at the beginning.



Simplification



The first versions of Ecmascript (i.e. 1 and 5) have had parseInt() and Number.prototype.toString(), which should be enough to implement the desired functionality (though note that the supported base values are 2-36, not 0-26).






const convertBase = (inputNumber, inputBase = 10, outputBase = 10) =>
parseInt(inputNumber, inputBase).toString(outputBase);

console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):', convertBase("10", 10, 11)); // "a"
console.log('convertBase("3", 10, 3):', convertBase("3", 10, 3)); // "10"
console.log('convertBase("4", 10, 3):', convertBase("4", 10, 3)); // "11"
console.log('convertBase(10, 10, 2):', convertBase(10, 10, 2)); // "1010"





1http://spencertipping.com/js-in-ten-minutes/js-in-ten-minutes.pdf2https://english.stackexchange.com/a/129277/213844






const convertBase = (inNumber, inBase = 10, outputBase = 10) => 
let result = ;
if (typeof inNumber !== "number" && typeof inNumber !== "string")
throw new Error("You input is not a number or a string.");

const encodings = ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"];
if (typeof inNumber === "number")
inNumber = JSON.stringify(inNumber);

if (inBase === outputBase)
return inNumber;

inNumber = inNumber.toLowerCase();
inNumber = inNumber.split("").map(item => encodings.indexOf(item));
inNumber = inNumber.reverse();
inNumber = inNumber.map((item, index) => item * Math.pow(inBase, index));
let res = 0;
inNumber.forEach(item => res += item);
let ones = res % outputBase;
let remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
let left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
ones = remainder;
remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
left = remainder > 1;

return result.map(item => encodings[item]).join("");
;
console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):',convertBase("10", 10, 11))





const convertBase = (inNumber, inBase = 10, outputBase = 10) => 
let result = ;
if (typeof inNumber !== "number" && typeof inNumber !== "string")
throw new Error("You input is not a number or a string.");

const encodings = ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"];
if (typeof inNumber === "number")
inNumber = JSON.stringify(inNumber);

if (inBase === outputBase)
return inNumber;

inNumber = inNumber.toLowerCase();
inNumber = inNumber.split("").map(item => encodings.indexOf(item));
inNumber = inNumber.reverse();
inNumber = inNumber.map((item, index) => item * Math.pow(inBase, index));
let res = 0;
inNumber.forEach(item => res += item);
let ones = res % outputBase;
let remainder = (res - res % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
let left = remainder > 1;
while (left)
ones = remainder;
remainder = (remainder - remainder % outputBase) / outputBase;
result.unshift(ones);
left = remainder > 1;

return result.map(item => encodings[item]).join("");
;
console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):',convertBase("10", 10, 11))





const convertBase = (inputNumber, inputBase = 10, outputBase = 10) =>
parseInt(inputNumber, inputBase).toString(outputBase);

console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):', convertBase("10", 10, 11)); // "a"
console.log('convertBase("3", 10, 3):', convertBase("3", 10, 3)); // "10"
console.log('convertBase("4", 10, 3):', convertBase("4", 10, 3)); // "11"
console.log('convertBase(10, 10, 2):', convertBase(10, 10, 2)); // "1010"





const convertBase = (inputNumber, inputBase = 10, outputBase = 10) =>
parseInt(inputNumber, inputBase).toString(outputBase);

console.log('convertBase("10", 10, 11):', convertBase("10", 10, 11)); // "a"
console.log('convertBase("3", 10, 3):', convertBase("3", 10, 3)); // "10"
console.log('convertBase("4", 10, 3):', convertBase("4", 10, 3)); // "11"
console.log('convertBase(10, 10, 2):', convertBase(10, 10, 2)); // "1010"






share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 30 at 18:00


























answered Apr 29 at 5:47









Sam Onela

5,78461544




5,78461544











  • *frowns* Looks like I didn't debug well.
    – FreezePhoenix
    Apr 29 at 13:23
















  • *frowns* Looks like I didn't debug well.
    – FreezePhoenix
    Apr 29 at 13:23















*frowns* Looks like I didn't debug well.
– FreezePhoenix
Apr 29 at 13:23




*frowns* Looks like I didn't debug well.
– FreezePhoenix
Apr 29 at 13:23












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193118%2fconvert-numbers-from-base-x-to-base-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Popular posts from this blog

Greedy Best First Search implementation in Rust

Function to Return a JSON Like Objects Using VBA Collections and Arrays

C++11 CLH Lock Implementation