python magic square finder for arbitrary numbers

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I wrote this code to get all possible magic squares that can be made with a list you put in. The only contraints are that the count of numbers is a square and that each number is unique. It even works for complex numbers.



I dont know how good the performance is, it needs about 1.5 to 2hours to find all 7040 4*4 magic squares with numbers from 1 to 16.



The finding strategy is to get all possible permutations of all subsets of the number set that sum to the magic number and then put these as a whole row into the matrix, recursively.



All feedback is welcome :)



from copy import deepcopy
from itertools import combinations, permutations
from math import sqrt


def main(numbers):
'''Finds all magic squares that can be made with
the given set of numbers.'''
global dim, magicnumber, emptyrow
dim = int(sqrt(len(numbers)))
magicnumber = sum(numbers) / dim
emptyrow = ["" for _ in range(dim)]
current = [emptyrow for _ in range(dim)]
groups = possibilities(numbers, dim, magicnumber)
placeRow(current, groups, row=0)
report(solutions)


def possibilities(numbers, dim, magicnumber):
'''Returns a list of all the ways to reach
the magic number with the given list of numbers.'''
combos = [
list(x) for x in list(
combinations(
numbers,
dim)) if sum(x) == magicnumber]
possibilities = [list(permutations(x)) for x in combos]
possibilities = [[list(y) for y in x] for x in possibilities]
possibilities = [item for sublist in possibilities for item in sublist]
return possibilities


def remainding_possibilities(matrix, possibilities):
'''Returns the remainding possibilities once the matrix has entries.'''
entries = item for sublist in matrix for item in sublist
remainders = [x for x in possibilities if entries.isdisjoint(x)]
return remainders


def placeRow(matrix, groups, row=0):
'''Recursive function that fills the matrix row wise
and puts magic squares into "solutions" list.'''
godeeper = False
current = matrix
for group in groups:
current[row] = group # put the whole group into the row
if emptyrow in current:
remainders = remainding_possibilities(current, groups)
godeeper = placeRow(current, remainders, row=row + 1)
else:
if check(current):
solutions.append(deepcopy(current))
current[row] = emptyrow
return False
else:
current[row] = emptyrow
if godeeper is False:
current[row] = emptyrow
return False


def check(matrix):
'''Returns false if current matrix is not or cant be made
into a magic square.'''
# rows
# not needed because we fill row wise
# for x in range(dim):
# if "" not in matrix[x]:
# if sum(matrix[x]) != magicnumber:
# return False
# only if we have positive numbers only
# else:
# if sum(transposed[x]) > magicnumber:
# return False

# diagonals
diag1 = [matrix[x][x] for x in range(dim)]
if "" not in diag1:
if sum(diag1) != magicnumber:
return False
# only if we have positive numbers only
else:
if sum(diag1) > magicnumber:
return False

diag2 = [matrix[x][dim - 1 - x] for x in range(dim)]
if "" not in diag2:
if sum(diag2) != magicnumber:
return False
# only if we have positive numbers only
else:
if sum(diag2) > magicnumber:
return False

# columns
transposed = transpose(matrix)
for x in range(dim):
if "" not in transposed[x]:
if sum(transposed[x]) != magicnumber:
return False
# only if we have positive numbers only
else:
if sum(transposed[x]) > magicnumber:
return False

return True


def transpose(matrix):
'''Transpose a matrix.'''
return list(map(list, zip(*matrix)))


def report(solutions):
''' Writes solutions to text file.'''
with open(f"solutions.txt", 'w') as txtfile:
txtfile.write(
f"Found len(solutions) magic squares:nn")
for solution in solutions:
for line in solution:
for entry in line:
txtfile.write(f"entry" + " ")
txtfile.write("n")
txtfile.write("n")


if __name__ == "__main__":
# Some inputs for main().
complex3 = [(complex(x, y))
for x in range(1, 4)
for y in range(1, 4)]
complex4 = [(complex(x, y))
for x in range(1, 5)
for y in range(1, 5)]
complex5 = [(complex(x, y))
for x in range(1, 6)
for y in range(1, 6)]
test3 = [x for x in range(1, 10)]
test4 = [x for x in range(1, 17)]
test5 = [x for x in range(1, 26)]
solutions =

main(complex3)






share|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    I wrote this code to get all possible magic squares that can be made with a list you put in. The only contraints are that the count of numbers is a square and that each number is unique. It even works for complex numbers.



    I dont know how good the performance is, it needs about 1.5 to 2hours to find all 7040 4*4 magic squares with numbers from 1 to 16.



    The finding strategy is to get all possible permutations of all subsets of the number set that sum to the magic number and then put these as a whole row into the matrix, recursively.



    All feedback is welcome :)



    from copy import deepcopy
    from itertools import combinations, permutations
    from math import sqrt


    def main(numbers):
    '''Finds all magic squares that can be made with
    the given set of numbers.'''
    global dim, magicnumber, emptyrow
    dim = int(sqrt(len(numbers)))
    magicnumber = sum(numbers) / dim
    emptyrow = ["" for _ in range(dim)]
    current = [emptyrow for _ in range(dim)]
    groups = possibilities(numbers, dim, magicnumber)
    placeRow(current, groups, row=0)
    report(solutions)


    def possibilities(numbers, dim, magicnumber):
    '''Returns a list of all the ways to reach
    the magic number with the given list of numbers.'''
    combos = [
    list(x) for x in list(
    combinations(
    numbers,
    dim)) if sum(x) == magicnumber]
    possibilities = [list(permutations(x)) for x in combos]
    possibilities = [[list(y) for y in x] for x in possibilities]
    possibilities = [item for sublist in possibilities for item in sublist]
    return possibilities


    def remainding_possibilities(matrix, possibilities):
    '''Returns the remainding possibilities once the matrix has entries.'''
    entries = item for sublist in matrix for item in sublist
    remainders = [x for x in possibilities if entries.isdisjoint(x)]
    return remainders


    def placeRow(matrix, groups, row=0):
    '''Recursive function that fills the matrix row wise
    and puts magic squares into "solutions" list.'''
    godeeper = False
    current = matrix
    for group in groups:
    current[row] = group # put the whole group into the row
    if emptyrow in current:
    remainders = remainding_possibilities(current, groups)
    godeeper = placeRow(current, remainders, row=row + 1)
    else:
    if check(current):
    solutions.append(deepcopy(current))
    current[row] = emptyrow
    return False
    else:
    current[row] = emptyrow
    if godeeper is False:
    current[row] = emptyrow
    return False


    def check(matrix):
    '''Returns false if current matrix is not or cant be made
    into a magic square.'''
    # rows
    # not needed because we fill row wise
    # for x in range(dim):
    # if "" not in matrix[x]:
    # if sum(matrix[x]) != magicnumber:
    # return False
    # only if we have positive numbers only
    # else:
    # if sum(transposed[x]) > magicnumber:
    # return False

    # diagonals
    diag1 = [matrix[x][x] for x in range(dim)]
    if "" not in diag1:
    if sum(diag1) != magicnumber:
    return False
    # only if we have positive numbers only
    else:
    if sum(diag1) > magicnumber:
    return False

    diag2 = [matrix[x][dim - 1 - x] for x in range(dim)]
    if "" not in diag2:
    if sum(diag2) != magicnumber:
    return False
    # only if we have positive numbers only
    else:
    if sum(diag2) > magicnumber:
    return False

    # columns
    transposed = transpose(matrix)
    for x in range(dim):
    if "" not in transposed[x]:
    if sum(transposed[x]) != magicnumber:
    return False
    # only if we have positive numbers only
    else:
    if sum(transposed[x]) > magicnumber:
    return False

    return True


    def transpose(matrix):
    '''Transpose a matrix.'''
    return list(map(list, zip(*matrix)))


    def report(solutions):
    ''' Writes solutions to text file.'''
    with open(f"solutions.txt", 'w') as txtfile:
    txtfile.write(
    f"Found len(solutions) magic squares:nn")
    for solution in solutions:
    for line in solution:
    for entry in line:
    txtfile.write(f"entry" + " ")
    txtfile.write("n")
    txtfile.write("n")


    if __name__ == "__main__":
    # Some inputs for main().
    complex3 = [(complex(x, y))
    for x in range(1, 4)
    for y in range(1, 4)]
    complex4 = [(complex(x, y))
    for x in range(1, 5)
    for y in range(1, 5)]
    complex5 = [(complex(x, y))
    for x in range(1, 6)
    for y in range(1, 6)]
    test3 = [x for x in range(1, 10)]
    test4 = [x for x in range(1, 17)]
    test5 = [x for x in range(1, 26)]
    solutions =

    main(complex3)






    share|improve this question





















      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      I wrote this code to get all possible magic squares that can be made with a list you put in. The only contraints are that the count of numbers is a square and that each number is unique. It even works for complex numbers.



      I dont know how good the performance is, it needs about 1.5 to 2hours to find all 7040 4*4 magic squares with numbers from 1 to 16.



      The finding strategy is to get all possible permutations of all subsets of the number set that sum to the magic number and then put these as a whole row into the matrix, recursively.



      All feedback is welcome :)



      from copy import deepcopy
      from itertools import combinations, permutations
      from math import sqrt


      def main(numbers):
      '''Finds all magic squares that can be made with
      the given set of numbers.'''
      global dim, magicnumber, emptyrow
      dim = int(sqrt(len(numbers)))
      magicnumber = sum(numbers) / dim
      emptyrow = ["" for _ in range(dim)]
      current = [emptyrow for _ in range(dim)]
      groups = possibilities(numbers, dim, magicnumber)
      placeRow(current, groups, row=0)
      report(solutions)


      def possibilities(numbers, dim, magicnumber):
      '''Returns a list of all the ways to reach
      the magic number with the given list of numbers.'''
      combos = [
      list(x) for x in list(
      combinations(
      numbers,
      dim)) if sum(x) == magicnumber]
      possibilities = [list(permutations(x)) for x in combos]
      possibilities = [[list(y) for y in x] for x in possibilities]
      possibilities = [item for sublist in possibilities for item in sublist]
      return possibilities


      def remainding_possibilities(matrix, possibilities):
      '''Returns the remainding possibilities once the matrix has entries.'''
      entries = item for sublist in matrix for item in sublist
      remainders = [x for x in possibilities if entries.isdisjoint(x)]
      return remainders


      def placeRow(matrix, groups, row=0):
      '''Recursive function that fills the matrix row wise
      and puts magic squares into "solutions" list.'''
      godeeper = False
      current = matrix
      for group in groups:
      current[row] = group # put the whole group into the row
      if emptyrow in current:
      remainders = remainding_possibilities(current, groups)
      godeeper = placeRow(current, remainders, row=row + 1)
      else:
      if check(current):
      solutions.append(deepcopy(current))
      current[row] = emptyrow
      return False
      else:
      current[row] = emptyrow
      if godeeper is False:
      current[row] = emptyrow
      return False


      def check(matrix):
      '''Returns false if current matrix is not or cant be made
      into a magic square.'''
      # rows
      # not needed because we fill row wise
      # for x in range(dim):
      # if "" not in matrix[x]:
      # if sum(matrix[x]) != magicnumber:
      # return False
      # only if we have positive numbers only
      # else:
      # if sum(transposed[x]) > magicnumber:
      # return False

      # diagonals
      diag1 = [matrix[x][x] for x in range(dim)]
      if "" not in diag1:
      if sum(diag1) != magicnumber:
      return False
      # only if we have positive numbers only
      else:
      if sum(diag1) > magicnumber:
      return False

      diag2 = [matrix[x][dim - 1 - x] for x in range(dim)]
      if "" not in diag2:
      if sum(diag2) != magicnumber:
      return False
      # only if we have positive numbers only
      else:
      if sum(diag2) > magicnumber:
      return False

      # columns
      transposed = transpose(matrix)
      for x in range(dim):
      if "" not in transposed[x]:
      if sum(transposed[x]) != magicnumber:
      return False
      # only if we have positive numbers only
      else:
      if sum(transposed[x]) > magicnumber:
      return False

      return True


      def transpose(matrix):
      '''Transpose a matrix.'''
      return list(map(list, zip(*matrix)))


      def report(solutions):
      ''' Writes solutions to text file.'''
      with open(f"solutions.txt", 'w') as txtfile:
      txtfile.write(
      f"Found len(solutions) magic squares:nn")
      for solution in solutions:
      for line in solution:
      for entry in line:
      txtfile.write(f"entry" + " ")
      txtfile.write("n")
      txtfile.write("n")


      if __name__ == "__main__":
      # Some inputs for main().
      complex3 = [(complex(x, y))
      for x in range(1, 4)
      for y in range(1, 4)]
      complex4 = [(complex(x, y))
      for x in range(1, 5)
      for y in range(1, 5)]
      complex5 = [(complex(x, y))
      for x in range(1, 6)
      for y in range(1, 6)]
      test3 = [x for x in range(1, 10)]
      test4 = [x for x in range(1, 17)]
      test5 = [x for x in range(1, 26)]
      solutions =

      main(complex3)






      share|improve this question











      I wrote this code to get all possible magic squares that can be made with a list you put in. The only contraints are that the count of numbers is a square and that each number is unique. It even works for complex numbers.



      I dont know how good the performance is, it needs about 1.5 to 2hours to find all 7040 4*4 magic squares with numbers from 1 to 16.



      The finding strategy is to get all possible permutations of all subsets of the number set that sum to the magic number and then put these as a whole row into the matrix, recursively.



      All feedback is welcome :)



      from copy import deepcopy
      from itertools import combinations, permutations
      from math import sqrt


      def main(numbers):
      '''Finds all magic squares that can be made with
      the given set of numbers.'''
      global dim, magicnumber, emptyrow
      dim = int(sqrt(len(numbers)))
      magicnumber = sum(numbers) / dim
      emptyrow = ["" for _ in range(dim)]
      current = [emptyrow for _ in range(dim)]
      groups = possibilities(numbers, dim, magicnumber)
      placeRow(current, groups, row=0)
      report(solutions)


      def possibilities(numbers, dim, magicnumber):
      '''Returns a list of all the ways to reach
      the magic number with the given list of numbers.'''
      combos = [
      list(x) for x in list(
      combinations(
      numbers,
      dim)) if sum(x) == magicnumber]
      possibilities = [list(permutations(x)) for x in combos]
      possibilities = [[list(y) for y in x] for x in possibilities]
      possibilities = [item for sublist in possibilities for item in sublist]
      return possibilities


      def remainding_possibilities(matrix, possibilities):
      '''Returns the remainding possibilities once the matrix has entries.'''
      entries = item for sublist in matrix for item in sublist
      remainders = [x for x in possibilities if entries.isdisjoint(x)]
      return remainders


      def placeRow(matrix, groups, row=0):
      '''Recursive function that fills the matrix row wise
      and puts magic squares into "solutions" list.'''
      godeeper = False
      current = matrix
      for group in groups:
      current[row] = group # put the whole group into the row
      if emptyrow in current:
      remainders = remainding_possibilities(current, groups)
      godeeper = placeRow(current, remainders, row=row + 1)
      else:
      if check(current):
      solutions.append(deepcopy(current))
      current[row] = emptyrow
      return False
      else:
      current[row] = emptyrow
      if godeeper is False:
      current[row] = emptyrow
      return False


      def check(matrix):
      '''Returns false if current matrix is not or cant be made
      into a magic square.'''
      # rows
      # not needed because we fill row wise
      # for x in range(dim):
      # if "" not in matrix[x]:
      # if sum(matrix[x]) != magicnumber:
      # return False
      # only if we have positive numbers only
      # else:
      # if sum(transposed[x]) > magicnumber:
      # return False

      # diagonals
      diag1 = [matrix[x][x] for x in range(dim)]
      if "" not in diag1:
      if sum(diag1) != magicnumber:
      return False
      # only if we have positive numbers only
      else:
      if sum(diag1) > magicnumber:
      return False

      diag2 = [matrix[x][dim - 1 - x] for x in range(dim)]
      if "" not in diag2:
      if sum(diag2) != magicnumber:
      return False
      # only if we have positive numbers only
      else:
      if sum(diag2) > magicnumber:
      return False

      # columns
      transposed = transpose(matrix)
      for x in range(dim):
      if "" not in transposed[x]:
      if sum(transposed[x]) != magicnumber:
      return False
      # only if we have positive numbers only
      else:
      if sum(transposed[x]) > magicnumber:
      return False

      return True


      def transpose(matrix):
      '''Transpose a matrix.'''
      return list(map(list, zip(*matrix)))


      def report(solutions):
      ''' Writes solutions to text file.'''
      with open(f"solutions.txt", 'w') as txtfile:
      txtfile.write(
      f"Found len(solutions) magic squares:nn")
      for solution in solutions:
      for line in solution:
      for entry in line:
      txtfile.write(f"entry" + " ")
      txtfile.write("n")
      txtfile.write("n")


      if __name__ == "__main__":
      # Some inputs for main().
      complex3 = [(complex(x, y))
      for x in range(1, 4)
      for y in range(1, 4)]
      complex4 = [(complex(x, y))
      for x in range(1, 5)
      for y in range(1, 5)]
      complex5 = [(complex(x, y))
      for x in range(1, 6)
      for y in range(1, 6)]
      test3 = [x for x in range(1, 10)]
      test4 = [x for x in range(1, 17)]
      test5 = [x for x in range(1, 26)]
      solutions =

      main(complex3)








      share|improve this question










      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question









      asked May 1 at 7:44









      Tweakimp

      2621212




      2621212




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Just reviewing the function possibilities.



          This function is doing a lot of unnecessary extra work and I think it would be worth your while trying to understand why you made it so complicated.



          The first steps are: (i) find all combinations of dim elements of numbers; (ii) convert the combinations to a list; (iii) filter for combinations that add up to the magic number; (iv) convert each combination to a list.



          combos = [
          list(x) for x in list(
          combinations(
          numbers,
          dim)) if sum(x) == magicnumber]


          What is the purpose of steps (ii) and (iv)? If you omit these steps then this line simplifies to:



          combos = [x for x in combinations(numbers, dim) if sum(x) == magicnumber]


          and this works just as well as the original.



          The next steps are: (v) find the permutations of each combination; (vi) turn each group of permutations into a list; (vii) turn each permutation into a list; (viii) flatten the list of lists of permutations into a single list.



          possibilities = [list(permutations(x)) for x in combos]
          possibilities = [[list(y) for y in x] for x in possibilities]
          possibilities = [item for sublist in possibilities for item in sublist]


          But again, steps (vi) and (vii) are unnecessary, and steps (v) and (viii) can be combined into one, leaving you with:



          possibilities = [p for x in combos for p in permutations(x)]


          and the definition of combos can be inlined here, getting:



          return [p for c in combinations(numbers, dim)
          if sum(c) == magicnumber
          for p in permutations(c)]





          share|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your answer. The code just "grew" that way and then I couldnt refactor it to a shorter version like you did. Would you be so kind to also look at remainding_possibilities, because most of the run time comes from that function.
            – Tweakimp
            May 1 at 9:18






          • 1




            When code "just grows" that means that you don't fully understand how it works and you've lost control of it. The way to regain understanding is to work through the steps in detail on a small example, so that you can see how each step transforms the data structures.
            – Gareth Rees
            May 1 at 9:43










          • I dont think we are talking about the same thing. What I meant was as I was writing it, I changed it many times until it worked and then I couldnt go back or rephrase it because I am not good enough to say it in another way. That is exactly why I post here.
            – Tweakimp
            May 1 at 9:49










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193332%2fpython-magic-square-finder-for-arbitrary-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Just reviewing the function possibilities.



          This function is doing a lot of unnecessary extra work and I think it would be worth your while trying to understand why you made it so complicated.



          The first steps are: (i) find all combinations of dim elements of numbers; (ii) convert the combinations to a list; (iii) filter for combinations that add up to the magic number; (iv) convert each combination to a list.



          combos = [
          list(x) for x in list(
          combinations(
          numbers,
          dim)) if sum(x) == magicnumber]


          What is the purpose of steps (ii) and (iv)? If you omit these steps then this line simplifies to:



          combos = [x for x in combinations(numbers, dim) if sum(x) == magicnumber]


          and this works just as well as the original.



          The next steps are: (v) find the permutations of each combination; (vi) turn each group of permutations into a list; (vii) turn each permutation into a list; (viii) flatten the list of lists of permutations into a single list.



          possibilities = [list(permutations(x)) for x in combos]
          possibilities = [[list(y) for y in x] for x in possibilities]
          possibilities = [item for sublist in possibilities for item in sublist]


          But again, steps (vi) and (vii) are unnecessary, and steps (v) and (viii) can be combined into one, leaving you with:



          possibilities = [p for x in combos for p in permutations(x)]


          and the definition of combos can be inlined here, getting:



          return [p for c in combinations(numbers, dim)
          if sum(c) == magicnumber
          for p in permutations(c)]





          share|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your answer. The code just "grew" that way and then I couldnt refactor it to a shorter version like you did. Would you be so kind to also look at remainding_possibilities, because most of the run time comes from that function.
            – Tweakimp
            May 1 at 9:18






          • 1




            When code "just grows" that means that you don't fully understand how it works and you've lost control of it. The way to regain understanding is to work through the steps in detail on a small example, so that you can see how each step transforms the data structures.
            – Gareth Rees
            May 1 at 9:43










          • I dont think we are talking about the same thing. What I meant was as I was writing it, I changed it many times until it worked and then I couldnt go back or rephrase it because I am not good enough to say it in another way. That is exactly why I post here.
            – Tweakimp
            May 1 at 9:49














          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Just reviewing the function possibilities.



          This function is doing a lot of unnecessary extra work and I think it would be worth your while trying to understand why you made it so complicated.



          The first steps are: (i) find all combinations of dim elements of numbers; (ii) convert the combinations to a list; (iii) filter for combinations that add up to the magic number; (iv) convert each combination to a list.



          combos = [
          list(x) for x in list(
          combinations(
          numbers,
          dim)) if sum(x) == magicnumber]


          What is the purpose of steps (ii) and (iv)? If you omit these steps then this line simplifies to:



          combos = [x for x in combinations(numbers, dim) if sum(x) == magicnumber]


          and this works just as well as the original.



          The next steps are: (v) find the permutations of each combination; (vi) turn each group of permutations into a list; (vii) turn each permutation into a list; (viii) flatten the list of lists of permutations into a single list.



          possibilities = [list(permutations(x)) for x in combos]
          possibilities = [[list(y) for y in x] for x in possibilities]
          possibilities = [item for sublist in possibilities for item in sublist]


          But again, steps (vi) and (vii) are unnecessary, and steps (v) and (viii) can be combined into one, leaving you with:



          possibilities = [p for x in combos for p in permutations(x)]


          and the definition of combos can be inlined here, getting:



          return [p for c in combinations(numbers, dim)
          if sum(c) == magicnumber
          for p in permutations(c)]





          share|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your answer. The code just "grew" that way and then I couldnt refactor it to a shorter version like you did. Would you be so kind to also look at remainding_possibilities, because most of the run time comes from that function.
            – Tweakimp
            May 1 at 9:18






          • 1




            When code "just grows" that means that you don't fully understand how it works and you've lost control of it. The way to regain understanding is to work through the steps in detail on a small example, so that you can see how each step transforms the data structures.
            – Gareth Rees
            May 1 at 9:43










          • I dont think we are talking about the same thing. What I meant was as I was writing it, I changed it many times until it worked and then I couldnt go back or rephrase it because I am not good enough to say it in another way. That is exactly why I post here.
            – Tweakimp
            May 1 at 9:49












          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          Just reviewing the function possibilities.



          This function is doing a lot of unnecessary extra work and I think it would be worth your while trying to understand why you made it so complicated.



          The first steps are: (i) find all combinations of dim elements of numbers; (ii) convert the combinations to a list; (iii) filter for combinations that add up to the magic number; (iv) convert each combination to a list.



          combos = [
          list(x) for x in list(
          combinations(
          numbers,
          dim)) if sum(x) == magicnumber]


          What is the purpose of steps (ii) and (iv)? If you omit these steps then this line simplifies to:



          combos = [x for x in combinations(numbers, dim) if sum(x) == magicnumber]


          and this works just as well as the original.



          The next steps are: (v) find the permutations of each combination; (vi) turn each group of permutations into a list; (vii) turn each permutation into a list; (viii) flatten the list of lists of permutations into a single list.



          possibilities = [list(permutations(x)) for x in combos]
          possibilities = [[list(y) for y in x] for x in possibilities]
          possibilities = [item for sublist in possibilities for item in sublist]


          But again, steps (vi) and (vii) are unnecessary, and steps (v) and (viii) can be combined into one, leaving you with:



          possibilities = [p for x in combos for p in permutations(x)]


          and the definition of combos can be inlined here, getting:



          return [p for c in combinations(numbers, dim)
          if sum(c) == magicnumber
          for p in permutations(c)]





          share|improve this answer













          Just reviewing the function possibilities.



          This function is doing a lot of unnecessary extra work and I think it would be worth your while trying to understand why you made it so complicated.



          The first steps are: (i) find all combinations of dim elements of numbers; (ii) convert the combinations to a list; (iii) filter for combinations that add up to the magic number; (iv) convert each combination to a list.



          combos = [
          list(x) for x in list(
          combinations(
          numbers,
          dim)) if sum(x) == magicnumber]


          What is the purpose of steps (ii) and (iv)? If you omit these steps then this line simplifies to:



          combos = [x for x in combinations(numbers, dim) if sum(x) == magicnumber]


          and this works just as well as the original.



          The next steps are: (v) find the permutations of each combination; (vi) turn each group of permutations into a list; (vii) turn each permutation into a list; (viii) flatten the list of lists of permutations into a single list.



          possibilities = [list(permutations(x)) for x in combos]
          possibilities = [[list(y) for y in x] for x in possibilities]
          possibilities = [item for sublist in possibilities for item in sublist]


          But again, steps (vi) and (vii) are unnecessary, and steps (v) and (viii) can be combined into one, leaving you with:



          possibilities = [p for x in combos for p in permutations(x)]


          and the definition of combos can be inlined here, getting:



          return [p for c in combinations(numbers, dim)
          if sum(c) == magicnumber
          for p in permutations(c)]






          share|improve this answer













          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer











          answered May 1 at 8:53









          Gareth Rees

          41.1k394166




          41.1k394166











          • Thank you for your answer. The code just "grew" that way and then I couldnt refactor it to a shorter version like you did. Would you be so kind to also look at remainding_possibilities, because most of the run time comes from that function.
            – Tweakimp
            May 1 at 9:18






          • 1




            When code "just grows" that means that you don't fully understand how it works and you've lost control of it. The way to regain understanding is to work through the steps in detail on a small example, so that you can see how each step transforms the data structures.
            – Gareth Rees
            May 1 at 9:43










          • I dont think we are talking about the same thing. What I meant was as I was writing it, I changed it many times until it worked and then I couldnt go back or rephrase it because I am not good enough to say it in another way. That is exactly why I post here.
            – Tweakimp
            May 1 at 9:49
















          • Thank you for your answer. The code just "grew" that way and then I couldnt refactor it to a shorter version like you did. Would you be so kind to also look at remainding_possibilities, because most of the run time comes from that function.
            – Tweakimp
            May 1 at 9:18






          • 1




            When code "just grows" that means that you don't fully understand how it works and you've lost control of it. The way to regain understanding is to work through the steps in detail on a small example, so that you can see how each step transforms the data structures.
            – Gareth Rees
            May 1 at 9:43










          • I dont think we are talking about the same thing. What I meant was as I was writing it, I changed it many times until it worked and then I couldnt go back or rephrase it because I am not good enough to say it in another way. That is exactly why I post here.
            – Tweakimp
            May 1 at 9:49















          Thank you for your answer. The code just "grew" that way and then I couldnt refactor it to a shorter version like you did. Would you be so kind to also look at remainding_possibilities, because most of the run time comes from that function.
          – Tweakimp
          May 1 at 9:18




          Thank you for your answer. The code just "grew" that way and then I couldnt refactor it to a shorter version like you did. Would you be so kind to also look at remainding_possibilities, because most of the run time comes from that function.
          – Tweakimp
          May 1 at 9:18




          1




          1




          When code "just grows" that means that you don't fully understand how it works and you've lost control of it. The way to regain understanding is to work through the steps in detail on a small example, so that you can see how each step transforms the data structures.
          – Gareth Rees
          May 1 at 9:43




          When code "just grows" that means that you don't fully understand how it works and you've lost control of it. The way to regain understanding is to work through the steps in detail on a small example, so that you can see how each step transforms the data structures.
          – Gareth Rees
          May 1 at 9:43












          I dont think we are talking about the same thing. What I meant was as I was writing it, I changed it many times until it worked and then I couldnt go back or rephrase it because I am not good enough to say it in another way. That is exactly why I post here.
          – Tweakimp
          May 1 at 9:49




          I dont think we are talking about the same thing. What I meant was as I was writing it, I changed it many times until it worked and then I couldnt go back or rephrase it because I am not good enough to say it in another way. That is exactly why I post here.
          – Tweakimp
          May 1 at 9:49












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193332%2fpython-magic-square-finder-for-arbitrary-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Popular posts from this blog

          Chat program with C++ and SFML

          Function to Return a JSON Like Objects Using VBA Collections and Arrays

          Will my employers contract hold up in court?